Low- income housing

thanx.......

i've ammended the post as the image is way too big to post in the forums. also, even though the lighting is much nicer you still need to equal those dark areas out where the building meets the ground - there's completely black areas in there that wouldn't look like that in real life. and you've completely gone over-board on the lens abberation.

wath do u think about new modify i hop this time u like:)...

[COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times New Roman][FONT=arial]because the direction of light from behind and time is after noon [/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR]

doesnt matter, you still need light. you cant sell it in this state, the agent and customer wont buy it. even if it's subtle, it still needs light.

[COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times New Roman][FONT=arial]Thank u all very much for your comments and advice [/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR]

Took me exactly 4 seconds to tweak the curves on this image to make a huge improvement. Lots of potential here.. just some small adjustments needed.[ATTACH=CONFIG]40065[/ATTACH]

the lighting conditions and the uncared for ivy's make this image look more like one of an abandoned building... definitely needs more light.

are there a variety of materials on there, it nearlly looks like a clay rendering. Surely at least the handles and balcony railings are metal. Remove the plants on the right on the first floor, look ugly (in my opinion) AND Defo Re-light, or play with exposure.

[COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times New Roman][FONT=arial]yes the sun light are behind and time is after noon about[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times New Roman][FONT=arial][/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] 4:30PM [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times New Roman][FONT=arial]thanx for comment Yama.... [/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR]

I think it's ok if you have the sun from behind, if this is how it would be in reality then I would not cheat. BUT as in photography you can always edit a picture, meaning take it into Photoshop and try to experiment with contrast and brightness there. You got lots of options. There are lots of tutorials too about post work.....

thank u all for ur comment.....

Should be much higher exposure (brighter). And the chromatic aberration is too pronounced, esp on the trees.

Hmmm (clearing my throat) The front of tbe building needs to be lit. Period. I think the modeling is just fine but the mood and the colors, textures and overall presentation lack in a big way. Your presenting this to us as a rendering for low-income housing, if that's the case, id rather live under a bridge where i can see bright natural light and the surroundings in a much happier and colorful manner. Turn the sun around and repost, that will help us give you better feed back. HTH.

+1

archvis is about 'selling' the design. more and more people seems to just go for photo realism.

+1

archvis is about 'selling' the design. more and more people seems to just go for photo realism.

Making the assumption that the client wants an afternoon shot and the building is oriented as shown, you could up the exposure sensitivity (at the cost of blowing out the sky) to get the whole image's brightness up. I actually really like this shot and think it has lots of potential.

Need some light......low income doesn't mean it will be dark like this right?......;-)

Hmmm (clearing my throat) The front of tbe building needs to be lit. Period. I think the modeling is just fine but the mood and the colors, textures and overall presentation lack in a big way. Your presenting this to us as a rendering for low-income housing, if that's the case, id rather live under a bridge where i can see bright natural light and the surroundings in a much happier and colorful manner. Turn the sun around and repost, that will help us give you better feed back. HTH.

Only thing that bothers are the curtains. Everything else is realy very well done. RK

[COLOR=#000000][FONT=Times New Roman][FONT=arial]because the direction of light from behind and time is after noon thanx for comment Kippu.... [/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR]

wont it be better to have some light in the front?