Really really nice! I love it! What trees did you use? Well done! Submit Cancel

Really really nice! I love it! What trees did you use? Well done!

I agree very nice work, I like the deer. The composition is a little bottom-heavy though. Submit Cancel

I agree very nice work, I like the deer. The composition is a little bottom-heavy though.

Great job Gabriele! Submit Cancel

Great job Gabriele!

[QUOTE=Glessner Group]Great job Gabriele![/QUOTE] Hey Glessner, any freelance position? :) Submit Cancel

Quoting Glessner Group:
Great job Gabriele!

Hey Glessner, any freelance position?

AND PIC: We no longer hire freelance employees. Our Buenos Aires office is currently looking for interns. If interested email jobs2012@glessnergroup.com Submit Cancel

AND PIC: We no longer hire freelance employees. Our Buenos Aires office is currently looking for interns. If interested email jobs2012@glessnergroup.com

It's really awesome job! Submit Cancel

It's really awesome job!

[QUOTE=Glessner Group]AND PIC: We no longer hire freelance employees. Our Buenos Aires office is currently looking for interns. If interested email jobs2012@glessnergroup.com[/QUOTE] That's a shame!I'm to far from Buenos Aires. Actually I'm an architect that's why I only can do viz as freelance. Thank you anyway and keep doing good images! :) Submit Cancel

Quoting Glessner Group:
AND PIC: We no longer hire freelance employees. Our Buenos Aires office is currently looking for interns. If interested email jobs2012@glessnergroup.com

That's a shame!I'm to far from Buenos Aires.
Actually I'm an architect that's why I only can do viz as freelance. Thank you anyway and keep doing good images!

thank you all!! Submit Cancel

thank you all!!

What did you use to put this together? It is gorgeous! Submit Cancel

What did you use to put this together? It is gorgeous!

nothing special.. 3ds MAx, Vray and Ps! Submit Cancel

nothing special.. 3ds MAx, Vray and Ps!

I like your visualization especially 3ds max. Submit Cancel

I like your visualization especially 3ds max.

Nice job, very pleasant to the eye, but technically impossible ... The center of gravity of the upper part is above the empty, it is like putting a book on a table where more than half would be above the empty, here falls ... Submit Cancel

Nice job, very pleasant to the eye, but technically impossible ...
The center of gravity of the upper part is above the empty, it is like putting a book on a table where more than half would be above the empty, here falls ...

Actually I quite like the composition! I really enjoy when a archviz composition is as much about the environment as it is about the building. Gilles, I think this construction is quite feasible, thanks to the magic of structural steel ;) Submit Cancel

Actually I quite like the composition! I really enjoy when a archviz composition is as much about the environment as it is about the building.

Gilles, I think this construction is quite feasible, thanks to the magic of structural steel

[QUOTE=Matthew Spencer]Actually I quite like the composition! I really enjoy when a archviz composition is as much about the environment as it is about the building. Gilles, I think this construction is quite feasible, thanks to the magic of structural steel ;)[/QUOTE] right right... the secret is in the terrace... :D Submit Cancel

Quoting Matthew Spencer:
Actually I quite like the composition! I really enjoy when a archviz composition is as much about the environment as it is about the building.

Gilles, I think this construction is quite feasible, thanks to the magic of structural steel

right right...
the secret is in the terrace...

bellissimo lavoro gabriele!ma vicino a milano ci sono quei boschi!:)) gran tocco l'inserimento della luna! Submit Cancel

bellissimo lavoro gabriele!ma vicino a milano ci sono quei boschi!)
gran tocco l'inserimento della luna!

[QUOTE=Gilles Murguet]Nice job, very pleasant to the eye, but technically impossible ... The center of gravity of the upper part is above the empty, it is like putting a book on a table where more than half would be above the empty, here falls ...[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure the cantilevered portion of the structure has a physical connection to it's base. It's more like putting a book on a table and using rebar and concrete to connect the book to the table. Definitely possible. Ask any structural engineer. Submit Cancel

Quoting Gilles Murguet:
Nice job, very pleasant to the eye, but technically impossible ... The center of gravity of the upper part is above the empty, it is like putting a book on a table where more than half would be above the empty, here falls ...

I'm pretty sure the cantilevered portion of the structure has a physical connection to it's base. It's more like putting a book on a table and using rebar and concrete to connect the book to the table. Definitely possible. Ask any structural engineer.

Maybe you want to talk about B.A.E.L. (calculation of concrete and steel)? Submit Cancel

Maybe you want to talk about B.A.E.L. (calculation of concrete and steel)?

[QUOTE=Marco Venturelli]bellissimo lavoro gabriele!ma vicino a milano ci sono quei boschi!:)) gran tocco l'inserimento della luna![/QUOTE] Grazie! In preda all'afa milanese e l'insonia, ho realizzato il desiderio del momento..! Submit Cancel

Quoting Marco Venturelli:
bellissimo lavoro gabriele!ma vicino a milano ci sono quei boschi!)
gran tocco l'inserimento della luna!

Grazie! In preda all'afa milanese e l'insonia, ho realizzato il desiderio del momento..!

I just posted the question to Ask Engineers on Reddit. Let's see what the professionals have to say. [url=http://www.reddit.com/r/AskEngineers/comments/zw97d/structural_engineers_could_this_be_built_in_the/]Ask Engineers[/url] Submit Cancel

I just posted the question to Ask Engineers on Reddit. Let's see what the professionals have to say.

Ask Engineers

Good effort, Really giving the feelings of early morning. Submit Cancel

Good effort, Really giving the feelings of early morning.

awesome! +++ =) Submit Cancel

awesome! +++ =)

In this talk page it talks about problèmesde shear of the lower slab of the second floor due to "sharp point" and the buckling of the top slab of the second floor that could pose serious problems. It also speaks of prestressed concrete for bridges and as we see images of large parts overhanging the void but these parts are full (no empty part) and with a strong weight on the seated or in the case of bridges with cables to the overhang. The concept can be done, but not in this case: no weight or cable system to bring the center of gravity above the first floor, not to mention the windows placed exactly where are the strongest constraints. It is not the concept that is to review, it is the implementation which includes structural error. The image itself remains great and the concept is enchanting ;-) Submit Cancel

In this talk page it talks about problèmesde shear of the lower slab of the second floor due to "sharp point" and the buckling of the top slab of the second floor that could pose serious problems. It also speaks of prestressed concrete for bridges and as we see images of large parts overhanging the void but these parts are full (no empty part) and with a strong weight on the seated or in the case of bridges with cables to the overhang.
The concept can be done, but not in this case: no weight or cable system to bring the center of gravity above the first floor, not to mention the windows placed exactly where are the strongest constraints.
It is not the concept that is to review, it is the implementation which includes structural error.

The image itself remains great and the concept is enchanting ;-)

[QUOTE=Gilles Murguet]In this talk page it talks about problèmesde shear of the lower slab of the second floor due to "sharp point" and the buckling of the top slab of the second floor that could pose serious problems. It also speaks of prestressed concrete for bridges and as we see images of large parts overhanging the void but these parts are full (no empty part) and with a strong weight on the seated or in the case of bridges with cables to the overhang. The concept can be done, but not in this case: no weight or cable system to bring the center of gravity above the first floor, not to mention the windows placed exactly where are the strongest constraints. It is not the concept that is to review, it is the implementation which includes structural error. The image itself remains great and the concept is enchanting ;-)[/QUOTE] I agree the image looks good but Gilles is absolutely right even if you make steel structure it is impossible to give the look what you have shown here only ground floor structure will not be able to hold it. It is only possible if you have similar structure under the ground then only it will hold you need basement with same shape as 1st floor to keep the weight ratio proper so in section it will look like "C" shape. Regards Submit Cancel

Quoting Gilles Murguet:
In this talk page it talks about problèmesde shear of the lower slab of the second floor due to "sharp point" and the buckling of the top slab of the second floor that could pose serious problems. It also speaks of prestressed concrete for bridges and as we see images of large parts overhanging the void but these parts are full (no empty part) and with a strong weight on the seated or in the case of bridges with cables to the overhang.
The concept can be done, but not in this case: no weight or cable system to bring the center of gravity above the first floor, not to mention the windows placed exactly where are the strongest constraints.
It is not the concept that is to review, it is the implementation which includes structural error.

The image itself remains great and the concept is enchanting ;-)

I agree the image looks good but Gilles is absolutely right even if you make steel structure it is impossible to give the look what you have shown here only ground floor structure will not be able to hold it.
It is only possible if you have similar structure under the ground
then only it will hold you need basement with same shape as 1st floor to keep the weight ratio proper so in section it will look like "C" shape.
Regards

I'm really sorry to be the cause of a controversy over an image so beautiful, but here it is architecture, not the "SF" ... If I create a concept I have to be able to say how it is constructed and why is here. I just realized that in addition to the first floor walls are bevelled and no charge transfer is possible directly through the walls and all transfers are done only by the slab ... If I create the concept of a floating sphere, as beautiful as she will remain a concept here as I would not be able to tell how this sphere floats ... So I repeat: Nice 3D work (I like to be able to do so), nice concept but it is not building as it is, sorry ... Submit Cancel

I'm really sorry to be the cause of a controversy over an image so beautiful, but here it is architecture, not the "SF" ... If I create a concept I have to be able to say how it is constructed and why is here.
I just realized that in addition to the first floor walls are bevelled and no charge transfer is possible directly through the walls and all transfers are done only by the slab ...

If I create the concept of a floating sphere, as beautiful as she will remain a concept here as I would not be able to tell how this sphere floats ...

So I repeat: Nice 3D work (I like to be able to do so), nice concept but it is not building as it is, sorry ...

Which version of the 3D max? Trees is the RPC? Submit Cancel

Which version of the 3D max?
Trees is the RPC?

[QUOTE=behzad yazdani]Which version of the 3D max? Trees is the RPC?[/QUOTE] 3ds max 2010... no RPC Submit Cancel

Quoting behzad yazdani:
Which version of the 3D max?
Trees is the RPC?

3ds max 2010... no RPC

I am sorry about this controversy... This is only a concept.. I am a 3D artist .. “According to the laws of physics, hornets wouldn’t be able to fly. Hornets, however, don’t know this and fly anyway” Igor Sikorsky Submit Cancel

I am sorry about this controversy...
This is only a concept.. I am a 3D artist ..

“According to the laws of physics, hornets wouldn’t be able to fly. Hornets, however, don’t know this and fly anyway”
Igor Sikorsky

These are the bumblebees which we did not know why they could fly, since we know that it is forming vortex they multiply their lift. That said 3d rendering your work is superb! Really beautiful! Now you just know that you have a weakness in structural design ^ _ ^ Submit Cancel

These are the bumblebees which we did not know why they could fly, since we know that it is forming vortex they multiply their lift.
That said 3d rendering your work is superb! Really beautiful!

Now you just know that you have a weakness in structural design ^ _ ^

Gabriele - Can you tell us something about how you set up the sky? Superb render! Submit Cancel

Gabriele - Can you tell us something about how you set up the sky? Superb render!

[QUOTE=Toby Humphrey]Gabriele - Can you tell us something about how you set up the sky? Superb render![/QUOTE] yes sure.. the sky is a hdri you can use it in Vray environment (render setup) or with a vray dome light (texture slot) use it in 3ds max's background slot (press 8) too. Submit Cancel

Quoting Toby Humphrey:
Gabriele - Can you tell us something about how you set up the sky? Superb render!

yes sure..
the sky is a hdri
you can use it in Vray environment (render setup) or with a vray dome light (texture slot)
use it in 3ds max's background slot (press 8) too.

[QUOTE=Gabriele Coi][QUOTE=Toby Humphrey]Gabriele - Can you tell us something about how you set up the sky? Superb render![/QUOTE] yes sure.. the sky is a hdri you can use it in Vray environment (render setup) or with a vray dome light (texture slot) use it in 3ds max's background slot (press 8) too.[/QUOTE] That's a great HDRI, did you make it or buy it somewhere? Submit Cancel

Quoting Gabriele Coi:
[QUOTE=Toby Humphrey]Gabriele - Can you tell us something about how you set up the sky? Superb render!

yes sure..
the sky is a hdri
you can use it in Vray environment (render setup) or with a vray dome light (texture slot)
use it in 3ds max's background slot (press 8) too.[/QUOTE]

That's a great HDRI, did you make it or buy it somewhere?

You can buy some good hdri here: http://3docean.net/user/paguthrie/portfolio?ref=paguthrie Submit Cancel

You can buy some good hdri here:
http://3docean.net/user/paguthrie/portfolio?ref=paguthrie

I like it ... I think the hole building is like a bridge... I think the form of windows could be better if the designer has a better concept for create a window system design ... for light penetration like tadao Ando works !! He has nice project about playing between light and concrete mass! Submit Cancel

I like it ... I think the hole building is like a bridge... I think the form of windows could be better if the designer has a better concept for create a window system design ... for light penetration like tadao Ando works !! He has nice project about playing between light and concrete mass!

[QUOTE=Gabriele Coi] “According to the laws of physics, hornets wouldn’t be able to fly. Hornets, however, don’t know this and fly anyway” Igor Sikorsky[/QUOTE] BEAUTIFUL. Nice deer. Submit Cancel

Quoting Gabriele Coi:

“According to the laws of physics, hornets wouldn’t be able to fly. Hornets, however, don’t know this and fly anyway”
Igor Sikorsky

BEAUTIFUL.

Nice deer.

wow, awesome work ! Submit Cancel

wow, awesome work !

Excellent Work ...........! Submit Cancel

Excellent Work ...........!