Early morning..

Excellent Work ...........!

wow, awesome work !

“According to the laws of physics, hornets wouldn’t be able to fly. Hornets, however, don’t know this and fly anyway” Igor Sikorsky

BEAUTIFUL. Nice deer.

I like it ... I think the hole building is like a bridge... I think the form of windows could be better if the designer has a better concept for create a window system design ... for light penetration like tadao Ando works !! He has nice project about playing between light and concrete mass!

You can buy some good hdri here: http://3docean.net/user/paguthrie/portfolio?ref=paguthrie

Gabriele - Can you tell us something about how you set up the sky? Superb render!

yes sure.. the sky is a hdri you can use it in Vray environment (render setup) or with a vray dome light (texture slot) use it in 3ds max's background slot (press 8) too.

That's a great HDRI, did you make it or buy it somewhere?

Gabriele - Can you tell us something about how you set up the sky? Superb render!

yes sure.. the sky is a hdri you can use it in Vray environment (render setup) or with a vray dome light (texture slot) use it in 3ds max's background slot (press 8) too.

Gabriele - Can you tell us something about how you set up the sky? Superb render!

These are the bumblebees which we did not know why they could fly, since we know that it is forming vortex they multiply their lift. That said 3d rendering your work is superb! Really beautiful! Now you just know that you have a weakness in structural design ^ _ ^

I am sorry about this controversy... This is only a concept.. I am a 3D artist .. “According to the laws of physics, hornets wouldn’t be able to fly. Hornets, however, don’t know this and fly anyway” Igor Sikorsky

Which version of the 3D max? Trees is the RPC?

3ds max 2010... no RPC

Which version of the 3D max? Trees is the RPC?

I'm really sorry to be the cause of a controversy over an image so beautiful, but here it is architecture, not the "SF" ... If I create a concept I have to be able to say how it is constructed and why is here. I just realized that in addition to the first floor walls are bevelled and no charge transfer is possible directly through the walls and all transfers are done only by the slab ... If I create the concept of a floating sphere, as beautiful as she will remain a concept here as I would not be able to tell how this sphere floats ... So I repeat: Nice 3D work (I like to be able to do so), nice concept but it is not building as it is, sorry ...

In this talk page it talks about problèmesde shear of the lower slab of the second floor due to "sharp point" and the buckling of the top slab of the second floor that could pose serious problems. It also speaks of prestressed concrete for bridges and as we see images of large parts overhanging the void but these parts are full (no empty part) and with a strong weight on the seated or in the case of bridges with cables to the overhang. The concept can be done, but not in this case: no weight or cable system to bring the center of gravity above the first floor, not to mention the windows placed exactly where are the strongest constraints. It is not the concept that is to review, it is the implementation which includes structural error. The image itself remains great and the concept is enchanting ;-)

I agree the image looks good but Gilles is absolutely right even if you make steel structure it is impossible to give the look what you have shown here only ground floor structure will not be able to hold it. It is only possible if you have similar structure under the ground then only it will hold you need basement with same shape as 1st floor to keep the weight ratio proper so in section it will look like "C" shape. Regards

In this talk page it talks about problèmesde shear of the lower slab of the second floor due to "sharp point" and the buckling of the top slab of the second floor that could pose serious problems. It also speaks of prestressed concrete for bridges and as we see images of large parts overhanging the void but these parts are full (no empty part) and with a strong weight on the seated or in the case of bridges with cables to the overhang. The concept can be done, but not in this case: no weight or cable system to bring the center of gravity above the first floor, not to mention the windows placed exactly where are the strongest constraints. It is not the concept that is to review, it is the implementation which includes structural error. The image itself remains great and the concept is enchanting ;-)

awesome! +++ =)

Good effort, Really giving the feelings of early morning.

I just posted the question to Ask Engineers on Reddit. Let's see what the professionals have to say. Ask Engineers

bellissimo lavoro gabriele!ma vicino a milano ci sono quei boschi!:)) gran tocco l'inserimento della luna!

Grazie! In preda all'afa milanese e l'insonia, ho realizzato il desiderio del momento..!

Maybe you want to talk about B.A.E.L. (calculation of concrete and steel)?