Quote:
Originally Posted by AJLynn
I think those numbers sum it up quite well - the Cinema4D test and the Cinema4D animation render on the next page, and the Photoshop and Premiere tests, show very close to zero difference for different RAM speeds and timings. For games, the difference is a lot larger. (Remember that sites like these are usually written for gamers and will place more emphasis on games in their written analysis.)
They already tested single and dual CPUs and didn't show a difference between those when it comes to how much the RAM speed matters, and going to a quad isn't going to change things. Stick with the cheap RAM but make sure it's got some clock speed headroom - e.g., it's rated DDR2-800 and all your CPU needs is DDR2-667 or 533, and the latency numbers are reasonably low.
The 9450 is quite good, probably worth the $100 over what you can find the 6600 for, BUT under some circumstances it can be more difficult to overclock. The multipier is 8, not 9, so your MB and RAM need to support higher RAM/FSB speeds to achieve the same overclock.
|
The problem with those test is they are testing DDR3-1333 and DDR3-1066. Go look at benches with some DDR3-2000. You will see a huge improvement but even with the higher performance, I can't justify dropping $500 for 2gigs of DR3.
When it goes main-stream, DDR3 will be well worth the money and the performance boost will be wonderful.