![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| AutoCAD/AutoCAD Architecture AutoCAD/AutoCAD Architecture |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: canberra
Posts: 128
Name: Yihang Zhang |
Being reading up on these lately. as far as i understand it, 2006 is not too different from other releases that came before it as far as 3D modeling goes. But 2007 is more like sketchup then 2006.
Which one should i be learning? i dont have a copy of 2007 at the moment but is it also possible to model '2006 style' in 2007 and are their any benefits in doing that? Any first hand experience with modeling in 2007? Is it better than 2006? and most importantly, are their are drawbacks to 2007 3d modeling compared to 2006. thanks in advance Mac |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: vancouver, bc
Posts: 471
Name: paul rodham |
autocad 2007 has added a number of new features that are not available in earlier versions.
you can still model '2006 style' in 2007 like you suggest, but you would find the new tools hard to ignore/resist. off the top of my head, some of the new features that have absolutely changed my way of modeling include..... 1.) dynamic coordinate systems (X,Y,Z) 2.) solid lofting and sweep functions for more complex organic forms (terrain) 3.) visual styles (as opposed to hide/shade modes), 4.) solid editing and sections from solids rendering in autocad has also improved (more like MAX/VIZ) as well as additional tools for animation and camera setup (i don't render in autocad myself, but i teach it). this is all my opinion, but i would definitely work with a demo copy of 2007 as least, and get a sense for the new features. best of luck paul |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: canberra
Posts: 128
Name: Yihang Zhang |
2007 is amazing! The interface is actually better/easier than sketch up in my opinion. its actually quite fun to use and everything seems to stay nice and tidy unlike sketch up. In sketch up i always end up with missing faces but it hasnt happened in 2007, maybe it cant!
Definately something to use for early conceptual design. havent tried the 3D-2D functions yet but heck its autocad, the 2d stuff cant be that bad. that ive section tool also sounds pretty sweet.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the nutmeg state
Posts: 325
Name: S E H |
I give 2007 a big fat thumbs down. There are a couple of actually new tools which are good, but all the commands are now dumbed-down making it more difficult and slower for someone that actually knows the program.
Bah! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Phx
Age: 31
Posts: 586
Name: Jonas Callewaert |
how soon before progecad has this too?
__________________
The most necessary/useful piece of learning is that which unlearns what is untrue: 'evil' may be acquiring Happiness through virtue which is based on knowledge!/? |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AUTOCAD 2007 Disaster | danatgia | AutoCAD/AutoCAD Architecture | 28 | June 23rd, 2006 07:14 PM |
| autocad 2007 and my 64 bit system | 3dsmaxed | AutoCAD/AutoCAD Architecture | 2 | April 29th, 2006 10:53 PM |
| HUGE changes for AutoCAD 2007... HUGE! | Hazdaz | AutoCAD/AutoCAD Architecture | 20 | March 31st, 2006 01:14 AM |
| what is the fatest way to learn autocad 2006? | One Eye King | AutoCAD/AutoCAD Architecture | 5 | July 8th, 2005 11:44 AM |
| wishlist for AutoCAD 2006 | muzzy | AutoCAD/AutoCAD Architecture | 12 | January 13th, 2005 10:43 AM |