Welcome to CGarchitect.com Untitled Document

Go Back   CGarchitect.com > MAIN FORUMS > Hardware and Technical Discusions

Notices

Hardware and Technical Discusions For general discussions about rendering hardware and technical issues.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 18th, 2007   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Zagreb
Age: 28
Posts: 97

Name: Marko Zeko


Croatia 


Default nvidia quadro 1500 vs 3500 vs 4500

In my firm we are buying a new computers.
My boss wants HP workstations.
It will be mainly used for ArchiCAD. Now I have to choose between those three graphic cards.
Does AC use resources of openGL cards?I heard not.
Do we have to go for 4500 which is 3 times more expensive than 1500?. As I see 1500 has 7900 chip and 4500 has 7800 chip, but 1500 has higher graphic memory bandwidth (40 vs 33,6 Gb/s), while 4500 has more memory (512 vs 256 Mb).
3500 has the same specifications as 1500 with little bit higher graphic memory bandwidth (42,2 Gb/s)
4500 is 3 times more expensive than 1500.
3500 is twice as price of 1500.
mzex is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old January 18th, 2007   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Serbia and Montenegro
Age: 34
Posts: 244

Name: Zdravko Barisic


Serbia 


Default Re: nvidia quadro 1500 vs 3500 vs 4500

Zdravo Marko,

Do not look at those numbers, they do not have anything w/real work, from my opinion as AC user for last 5 years (switching from archicad<>Autocad) ArchiCAD do NOT use any kind of ANY hardware accelaration stuffs.
For AC is tha SAME do you use gaming card or "pro".
Stick w/7900GTO/GS or 7600GT, it will cost 10times less and invest int ogood ploters or monitors or for extra pay for some nice looking secretary.
Ofcourse, you should go "nvidia way".
again, AC is very bad w/HW support........
okmijun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old January 18th, 2007   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: yorkshire
Age: 37
Posts: 167

Name: neil poppleton


United Kingdom 


Default Re: nvidia quadro 1500 vs 3500 vs 4500

we have the 1500 cards, and use autocad and viz.

The card works very well with both applicationsss.
lost in 3d world is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old January 18th, 2007   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Zagreb
Age: 28
Posts: 97

Name: Marko Zeko


Croatia 


Default Re: nvidia quadro 1500 vs 3500 vs 4500

Quote:
Originally Posted by okmijun View Post
Zdravo Marko,

Do not look at those numbers, they do not have anything w/real work, from my opinion as AC user for last 5 years (switching from archicad<>Autocad) ArchiCAD do NOT use any kind of ANY hardware accelaration stuffs.
For AC is tha SAME do you use gaming card or "pro".
Stick w/7900GTO/GS or 7600GT, it will cost 10times less and invest int ogood ploters or monitors or for extra pay for some nice looking secretary.
Ofcourse, you should go "nvidia way".
again, AC is very bad w/HW support........
Pozdrav okmijun
fala na savjetu.

But as I see 1500 is not much more expensive (400 euros) compared to 7900 GTO, and my boss is buying that machines from authorized reseller for HP, so we don't have that good choice. Anyway in first configuration he was offered 4500, so he will save 1000 euros if he goes with my advice.

Thank you all.

Okmijun,
you could visit archicad.com.hr. It is site dedicated to archiCAD. It is in Croatian language, but with members from all of ex Yugoslavia.
mzex is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old January 18th, 2007   #5 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Antisthenes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Phx
Age: 31
Posts: 620

Name: Jonas Callewaert


Belgium 


Default Re: nvidia quadro 1500 vs 3500 vs 4500

get a 6800GT and turn it to a 4000quardro for 75 euros
__________________
The most necessary/useful piece of learning is that which unlearns what is untrue: 'evil'
may be acquiring Happiness through virtue which is based on knowledge!/?
Antisthenes is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old January 18th, 2007   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NY
Age: 44
Posts: 138

Name: Michael White


United_States 


Default Re: nvidia quadro 1500 vs 3500 vs 4500

Not the same cards, but the same issue. I bought a high end (relatively) workstation 2 years ago with the nVidia Quadro FX 1300 for $481 since I didn't want to blow to much more than that.

Since day one the card has caused the computer to shut down in multiple applications. Tried the latest drivers, swapping my RAM - nothing worked. It got to the point I had to have autosave set for 1 minute since the computer was crashing none stop.

I got a job with brutal geometry and had to get things done, so one night out of desperation I ran to Staples and bought an nVidia GeForce 7300 GS which is pretty much low end entry level consumer grade for $69.

The computer has never crashed and I can say that I see very little if any difference between the two cards when modeling with very high polycount. Both cards bog down when I turn on the high details but work pretty much the same with moderate polycounts (I know thats pretty vague) - so I would not invest in the higher cost cards without first testing them on some real life models. I would agree that the numbers seem to be somewhat removed from real life 3D modeling.

Good luck.
mwhite is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old January 19th, 2007   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GI Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Monterrey
Age: 32
Posts: 268

Name: Alex Guzman


Mexico 


Default Re: nvidia quadro 1500 vs 3500 vs 4500

I Use ADT 2000 with a Quadro FX 1300 128MB and it works pretty good,
Any Videocard with 128 MB is good for ArchiCAD, and you don't need a Profesional Video Card, yo can use a GForce FX, as long as you stay away from the autodesk line, you won't need high end hardware graphics,

The 1500 is a good choice, even for 3ds max because is a mid range workstation card, and it's relatively cheap, around 400 USD, as for the HP Workstation, i would choose dell since they are cheaper, and you can configure it the way you want...

www.dell.com
__________________
Alex Guzman
GI Dude is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3D drivers and NVidia Jefferson Grigsby Hardware and Technical Discusions 14 January 23rd, 2007 10:44 AM
NVIDIA QUADRO FX CARD Archy@NJIT Hardware and Technical Discusions 1 July 2nd, 2003 06:05 AM
Nvidia Quadro 4 900 XGL Wolf Hardware and Technical Discusions 15 August 8th, 2002 05:06 AM
Nvidia Quadro 4 Vs. Quadro 1 w/Maxtreme Erik Lund Hardware and Technical Discusions 2 July 8th, 2002 01:08 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:23 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© Copyright 2001 – 2008 CGarchitect Digital Media Corp. All Rights Reserved.