![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Lightscape Autodesk Lightscape |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Silves
Posts: 7
Name: Sandy Lunitz |
Migrated the folder to XP x64 & Win2003 x64 with and without installed SP's (SP1 & SP2).
Since Vista SP1 is not official and I dont have it, I could not try LS on Vista SP1. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Serbia and Montenegro
Age: 34
Posts: 213
Name: Zdravko Barisic |
Quote:
Installed LS SP1 on 32bit PC and then migrate or install on 64bit PC on already migrated folder? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Silves
Posts: 7
Name: Sandy Lunitz |
Does'nt matter. You can install LS SP1 before migrating - on the 32bit system. Or you can install on the x64 system. Because after adding the reg keys, LS is offically installed, with all system paths. So the updater is able to find your LS 3.2 program location.
Only the add/remove feature in the control panel is missing - but who wants to uninstall Lightscape? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SE
Posts: 4
Name: Johan Sae-Thao |
This is the very same solution I posted a few months ago
http://www.cgarchitect.com/vb/26663-...tch-vista.html Cheers Johan Sae-Thao |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,161
Name: william york |
No since Lightscape is a 32bit program it will only be able to use 4gigs, and it will never be upgraded to a 64bit program...sorry
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
One thing I dont understand...
Ive tested my old C2D on 2,80 GHz with 2GB ram VS. quad on 2,50 GHz with 4 GB of RAM... radiosity processing time was the same! What are the resons for this? ...is it because LS doesnt see more then one core when processing? ... in that case I had a pure situation of 2,80 GHz agains 2,50 GHz....this seems logical! But then again the question of memory remains....if one system had 2 GB and the other 4 GB, and both have 2,50 GHz of CPU power....shouldnt one be faster in processing then the other?!?! Im running WinXP-32bit Thanx!
__________________
Beeeee! |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lightscape Scripts for max | molson | Scripts | 10 | July 25th, 2008 05:39 AM |
| installing win xp pro x64 on MacPro | mesht | Hardware and Technical Discusions | 8 | March 18th, 2007 08:46 PM |
| (Old Topic) Lightscape versus XP or ? | dbillo | Lightscape | 27 | April 8th, 2005 03:53 PM |
| Graphic card for lightscape. | Lidia | Lightscape | 13 | March 24th, 2005 12:02 PM |
| lightscape to be retired | stephen gilbert | Lightscape | 14 | December 22nd, 2002 10:11 AM |