|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Hardware and Technical Discusions For general discussions about rendering hardware and technical issues. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
May 19th, 2008
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Romania
Age: 32
Posts: 119
Name: Mihai Vitega  |
Re: Q9450 - overclocking
Hi
Finally I have just one question: Is it worth it to push the system (based on Q9450) with overclocking? The performance is noticeable as seen in the previous comments but how about stability in time and lifetime of the components. In this case the best memory available is a must. I`ll keep you informed about my experience with my new system…. It will be mine next week. Best regards. Mihai |
|
    
|
|
May 19th, 2008
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 270
Name: David Hansen  |
Re: Q9450
i probally wont overclock my new system(should have it in about a week) why push it and risk stability.
my 2cents on overclocking is it's cool for gamers with alot of free time to test and crash their systems and to post(pissing contest) their faster speeds and lower temps online but for us folks in production stability is much more important than being .3mhz faster than the next guy...if i really wanted a faster cpu than the Q9450 i would have just bought it... |
|
|
|
|
May 20th, 2008
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Romania
Age: 32
Posts: 119
Name: Mihai Vitega |
Re: Q9450
Hi again.
The configuration is almost ready: - processor Q9450 - mainboard Intel Bontrail INBLKDX38BT - videocard - Gigabyte - PCIEX16, 512MB, GDDR3, GF9600GT - RAM - 2GB PC8500 DDRII 1066 - HDD – 500GB WD Unfortunately Nvidia 9800 was a bit too expensive for me. Best regards. Mihai |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
