![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Other 3rd Party Renderers Posts about 3rd party plug-in renderers like Brazil r/s, Final Render etc. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 91
Name: Isa Greg |
When I was playing with FRY 1.8 DEMO I remember it was able to render very nice night skies. And it was automatic, all you had to do is set the time of the day to evening hours. And you had beautiful dark blue sky...
Yesterday I was playing with new DEMO, RC. The night sky is gone. I was trying really hard to get that "blue" night... But I couldn"t... I'm just wondering, was I doing something wrong or that feature is really not there anymore? P.S. I even remember seeing skies with stars... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
|
Hi Isa,
The night sky feature has been removed until further notice. You can get better results with a good-quality hdri and with Importance Sampling enabled in the Environment settings. Hope that helps.
__________________
- Fran If you must reinvent the wheel, remember that it works best if it is, like, roundish. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 175
Name: Francisco Jeronimo |
Quote:
(unless i misunderstood it being locked on the trial for actually removed :X) Last edited by F J; June 26th, 2008 at 05:49 AM. Reason: hmmm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Being a sort-of 'simulated camera', Fry will produce drab looking images if you simply 'point and shoot' - just as a high end camera in real-life will not necessarily give you stunning photos using the default settings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Auckland
Posts: 84
Name: Owen Howard |
Quote:
Going outside and taking a photo of a building i modellled in max sounds really easy, and realistic - since its a photo - even if it were to look flat or dull, photoshop could be used aswell to touch it up...? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
In Vray, the settings you mention control the quality of your GI and the user will balance that against render time and the quality of the final output they require. In fryrender and other unbiased renderers, the longer you let the image render, the higher the quality and you can stop it at any time. Fryrender has a physical sky and sun system that you can set in any way you like. It also has simple environment lighting that will accept a color or hdri input. You create lights by applying an emitter material to geometry.
__________________
- Fran If you must reinvent the wheel, remember that it works best if it is, like, roundish. |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adding realistic clouds to sky or rendering | Timothy Saunders | 2D/3D Tutorials | 10 | 2 Weeks Ago 06:15 PM |
| Vray physical sky question | Tommy L | VRay Render | 4 | January 31st, 2008 06:12 AM |
| Twilight / Night sky HDRI | alexthg | General Discussions | 7 | June 1st, 2007 04:21 PM |
| to sky or not to sky | crazy homeless guy | Work in Progress (WIP) | 9 | October 23rd, 2005 02:39 AM |
| CIE standard overcast sky sim | Glen - UK | Lightscape | 9 | March 29th, 2005 06:29 PM |