niall browne - final

santos · March 22nd, 2005

there y'go.

Ernest Burden · March 27th, 2005

Your overall low-chroma image is a good choice to show the shapes. Too bright and the image becomes more about the outside skin and less about the transparency, which you show very well. The variation in the interior works nicely. It invites you in, though I would like to see more intense light at the base/entrance to make the point 'this is where you want to go'.

Design-wise, I don't know what the falling-over spaceframes are for. Nothing in the rendering answers that for me.

Lighting overall is good, but I see no effects from the standards or bollard in the fore. Some underwater lighting would really make the image sing.

hbetter · March 28th, 2005

A lot of work for one challenge. Very convincing. Great use of light, composition and materials.

Lon · March 29th, 2005

Are you sure all those shapes were included? Very creative design. The lighting and composition are good, I think they could’ve been better with some subtle tweaks. I agree with Ernest that lights in the water would’ve been great. The water is a little choppy. I would have liked to see a more recognizable reflection of the building. I wish I could see more of the sculpture in the water, and I think the lattices seem to be an afterthought.

honzal · March 29th, 2005

Very dramatic image but I am loosing the feel of scale and perspective immediately after I want to try to "read" the image.

Jan

matthewbannister · March 31st, 2005

Too monochromatic and missing some midtones. I can't help but get caught up in critiquing the architectural design. The object that we're looking at seems too centrally located on the frame and not composed. Pushing the object to the left would've created a far superior image, especially if we saw more of the mound to the right.

March 27th, 2005	#2 (permalink)
Ernest Burden Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Ossining, NY USA Posts: 4,999 Name: Ernest Burden III	Re: niall browne - final Your overall low-chroma image is a good choice to show the shapes. Too bright and the image becomes more about the outside skin and less about the transparency, which you show very well. The variation in the interior works nicely. It invites you in, though I would like to see more intense light at the base/entrance to make the point 'this is where you want to go'. Design-wise, I don't know what the falling-over spaceframes are for. Nothing in the rendering answers that for me. Lighting overall is good, but I see no effects from the standards or bollard in the fore. Some underwater lighting would really make the image sing. __________________ Ernest Burden III AcmeDigital architectural rendering

March 28th, 2005	#3 (permalink)
hbetter Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Boston Posts: 68 Name: Hansy Better	Re: niall browne - final A lot of work for one challenge. Very convincing. Great use of light, composition and materials.

March 29th, 2005	#4 (permalink)
Lon Member Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Cambridge, MA Posts: 64 Name: Lon Grohs	Re: niall browne - final Are you sure all those shapes were included? Very creative design. The lighting and composition are good, I think they could’ve been better with some subtle tweaks. I agree with Ernest that lights in the water would’ve been great. The water is a little choppy. I would have liked to see a more recognizable reflection of the building. I wish I could see more of the sculpture in the water, and I think the lattices seem to be an afterthought.

March 29th, 2005	#5 (permalink)
honzal Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: Czech Republic Posts: 49 Name: Jan Rybar	Re: niall browne - final Very dramatic image but I am loosing the feel of scale and perspective immediately after I want to try to "read" the image. Jan

March 31st, 2005	#6 (permalink)
matthewbannister Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: new york Age: 41 Posts: 68 Name: dbox matthew bannister	Re: niall browne - final Too monochromatic and missing some midtones. I can't help but get caught up in critiquing the architectural design. The object that we're looking at seems too centrally located on the frame and not composed. Pushing the object to the left would've created a far superior image, especially if we saw more of the mound to the right.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Niall Browne - WIP	santos	Challenge #1 - WIP	1	March 22nd, 2005 07:08 AM
Final Deadlines	Jeff Mottle	FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)	0	March 21st, 2005 10:05 AM
niall browne	santos	Challenge Qualifications	0	February 27th, 2005 08:03 PM
final render and RPC	alex3d	finalRender	3	November 11th, 2004 08:31 AM
MR + FG: How to save a Final Gathering Map?	nisus	3ds Max	3	June 15th, 2004 07:26 AM