![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Challenge #3 - FINAL If you are one of the top 20 contestants, please post your Final images here and comment on others FINAL posts. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
|
Here we have another work inspired by Escher, this time the house with stairs going in all directions. And yet the place is mostly plausible. It would be completely if not for the trees growning sideways on the walls. It's a lot of fun. You can hear the water flowing, bouncing off the wall shapes in odd ways. The textures on those walls recall Frank Lloyd Wright's cast concrete organic shapes.
While I suppose you are using the very green glass to bring green into the space, I find it takes away from the glass reading well. It;s fine in the less dark areas of glass, but quickly becomes overpowering. The blue is just right. Can't the trees carry some green instead of the glass? I find that the building seen outside confuses the image a bit, better with lower contrast. Framing is an issue, you have a lot going right with the walkways, shadows, openings to below, but then the rigt side has nothing. Besides a few weak shadows, you have nothing to frame the right. A person walking in would take care of it, organically. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
Not sure. The office of MC Echer? An original approach however the overall execution has become overly complex. The complex nature of the image could be developed to provide greater clarity. Perhaps an alternative camera position with less dead space to the right and emphasis of the primary elements within the scene.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
You have obliterated this space through the use of light and texture. The shadows overpower any other textures of the space and would of benefited from slightly more transparency. It would be great if the image could oscillate between cohesion and disorientation. At the moment it is overly disorienting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
I really am fascinated by this image/design though in looking at it several times over the last couple of weeks I really am frustrated about the point of view. What I see here is the architecture really challenging the idea of the ground plane and four walls and most poetically tying together the blue water and sky through the fissures in the walls, floor, and ceiling which I really love.
But then the rest of the skylight the natural counterpart to the L form of the waterfall and stream is cropped in favor of seeing a bunch of perspectivally distorted chairs below. This is further emphasized by the use of a vibrant orange here that doesnt seem to exist anywhere else in the scene. My recommendation is go back, look at the architecture, what is the story you want to tell and make your decisions using that narrative. Last edited by jkletzien; June 15th, 2005 at 01:26 PM. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| martin pettigrew - final | marpetti | Challenge #2 - FINAL | 6 | June 1st, 2005 12:19 PM |
| martin pettigrew - wip | marpetti | Challenge #3 - WIP | 3 | May 31st, 2005 05:31 PM |
| Alex Martin Proebius - Final | RIP | Challenge #1 - FINAL | 5 | March 31st, 2005 11:09 AM |
| Martin Pettigrew - WIP | marpetti | Challenge #1 - WIP | 6 | March 17th, 2005 10:58 AM |
| Martin Pettigrew | marpetti | Challenge Qualifications | 0 | February 24th, 2005 09:48 PM |