![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| General Discussions For general discussions about rendering, animations, walkthroughs and CGarchitecture |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sarasota, FL
Age: 36
Posts: 1,058
Name: Brian Smith |
Depends on a lot of things. Since you're in the U.S., I would for suggest 720x480. If you get a HD-DVD recorder, due out this month I believe, you have the option of playing back at 1280x720 or 1920x1080. You also have the option of rendering at high def resolution and down converting to standard dvd quality. When you do, everything will be remarkably sharper and have less problems like flickering and pixel dancing, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Age: 34
Posts: 2,507
Name: Devin Johnston |
This thing is going to play off of a DVD player so on a wide screen TV, I know that standard TV resolution in NTSC is 720x480 but I figured a wide screen format would require a different resolution since the aspect ratio was different. Is that wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
The 720x480 (sometimes written as 720x486) is for progressive scan. You need to find out if your piece needs to be interlaced, probably the 1080i format There was a post at cgTalk by Simon Wicker that covers a lot of this: http://forums.cgsociety.org/showpost...93&postcount=1 from it: Quote:
By the way, I've always rendered to the 720x480 size, and been happy with it. But hi-def TVs are getting bigger and sharper, and maybe that size will no longer impress. Last edited by Ernest Burden; September 21st, 2006 at 01:34 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
The difference is not the resolution, its the Pixel Aspect Ratio. Widescreen simply uses a non-square pixel to make the image wider. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Age: 34
Posts: 2,507
Name: Devin Johnston |
Thanks Ernest that helps, I just though since the screen was different the resolution was to but I'm glad it's not because I'm doing this in Maxwell and I didn't want to increase my render times any more than they are now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Age: 34
Posts: 2,507
Name: Devin Johnston |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,179
Name: william york |
Hmmm... lets work on this from another direction, what aspect ratio is your DVD authoring software going to accept ?? they can be very picky when they encode to mpeg2
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
|
Quote:
Notice that doing widescreen involved non-square pixels. The render engine has to know that. Can MWR do a PAR other than 1:1? If so, go with the 720x480@PAR .9 If not....uh, well.... render to 864 x 480@1:1, but no. Let's see, Photoshop CS will convert a PAR, but the issue is not having your image distorted. The DVD burning software forces a PAR, outputting to Quicktime is where I came up with the 720>864 conversion. Before you do anything find out about MWR and its PAR abilities. |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Image size and resolution | blair | Photoshop | 4 | May 24th, 2007 09:06 AM |
| Material resolution in viewport | aflack | 3ds Max | 8 | July 17th, 2006 10:02 AM |
| Image resolution? | antonio_frias | 3ds Max | 5 | February 27th, 2006 10:51 AM |
| rendering for an outdoor LED SCREEN | dnaranjo | General Discussions | 2 | January 11th, 2006 12:36 PM |
| window opening off screen?? | C.Vestal | General Discussions | 2 | July 1st, 2004 04:36 PM |