Welcome to CGarchitect.com Untitled Document

Go Back   CGarchitect.com > 3D SOFTWARE > Maxwell Render

Notices

Maxwell Render Next Limit Maxwell Renderer

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Sponsored Links

Old October 4th, 2007   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
rotten42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: calgary
Age: 44
Posts: 193

Name: ron volpi


Canada 


Default Thinking about Maxwell

I've been looking to migrate from Lightscape to a different render engine. I know most people say go to 3D studio. From an outsiders perspective it looks like a pig of a program to get to learn.

If I understand correctly you can get a stand alone application for Maxwell. How does it compare to Max:

1) difficulty to learn
2) Render Quality (Actually I've already seen that it turns out some nice photo-realistic stuff)
3) render times



I would primarily need a program for rendering....maybe form video down the road. I do achitectural interior work most of the time.



Any advice would be great.
__________________
Mental Health is over-rated
rotten42 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 4th, 2007   #2 (permalink)
President/Founder
 
Jeff Mottle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Age: 33
Posts: 5,059

Name: Jeff Mottle


Canada Send a message via ICQ to Jeff Mottle Send a message via AIM to Jeff Mottle Send a message via MSN to Jeff Mottle Send a message via Yahoo to Jeff Mottle Send a message via Skype™ to Jeff Mottle


Default Re: Thinking about Maxwell

No matter what, you are going to need 3ds max as the modeler/animator, unless you are thinking of something like C4D, which is less commonly used, but still powerful. Maxwell, V-Ray, finalRender, fryRender, Brazil are all 3rd party rendering engines that plug into 3ds max. Max comes with mental ray, so if you do not want or do not have the budget, max on its own is pretty powerful for doing everything.

Having come from Lightscape and then switching to max years ago, I can tell you that no application is going to be a streamlined, as fast or elegant as Lightscape. You just have to resign yourself to the fact that your workflow will slow down as a result.
__________________
Jeff Mottle
CGarchitect.com
Jeff Mottle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 4th, 2007   #3 (permalink)
Moderator
 
AJLynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Beantown
Age: 29
Posts: 4,427

Name: Andrew Lynn


United_States 


Default Re: Thinking about Maxwell

But if he's using Lightscape, he already modeling in some other program, which can probably export something that Maxwell Studio can import.

That said, Maxwell Studio isn't much fun either - I think it makes render setup tasks more cumbersome than setting up in something like Max, and it ties your whole workflow after modeling to Nextlimit. Also, Maxwell is particularly slow at interiors because of the amount of calculation involved in propagating the lighting.

I'd recommend you take a good look at Cinema4D. It just got an Autocad importer update, it's fairly inexpansive and very stable and easy to learn, and I've found it just as powerful as Max for most arch vis stuff. Its Advanced Render module is pretty easy to use and has good shaders but its GI system isn't up to the level of mental ray, Vray or finalRender. Fortunately it does have Vray and finalRender available.
AJLynn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 5th, 2007   #4 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
manta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,174

Name: william york


United_States 


Default Re: Thinking about Maxwell

I think we need to know what program you are using for modeling now...

A couple things to think about are (1) Modo or
(2) Viz + fryrender combo

I've been seeing some incredible stuff coming from Modo with its native renderer, also people say that modeling with it is a dream...

And Viz, most of 3ds max, without the high price, and fryrender which has pretty much all the features of maxwell and vray put together...
__________________
DESIGN FORWARD
http://www.mantastudios.com
manta is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 8th, 2007   #5 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Maxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Age: 34
Posts: 2,491

Name: Devin Johnston


United_States 


Default Re: Thinking about Maxwell

The render times and quality of Maxwell Studio are the same as they would be for any of its plugins because they are simply exporting the 3D data directly to the Maxwell render engine just like Studio does. It would be easier to learn than 3D Studio since all you’re doing is setting up materials and lights and all the modeling can be handled in your current application. Just don't expect it to be as fast as Lightscape, my experience has been that it's at least 5 times slower than any GI or Radiosity based solution when doing interiors unless there extremely simple.
__________________
“There is no spoon”
http://devinjohnston.cgsociety.org/gallery/
Maxer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 8th, 2007   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 454

Name: Andrew Dehus


United_States 


Default Re: Thinking about Maxwell

You can get really nice results from Maxwell, but you pay dearly for them in render time. In my recent experience, on an 8 core machine, exteriors render out in about an hour to 8 hours (1600x1200) but interiors can take 20-60 hours depending on the lighting.

If you're thinking towards doing animations (which is what I assume when you say 'video'), I would seriously advise against Maxwell. I've seen a couple of nice animations done with it, but unless you have some SERIOUS computing horsepower, forget it.

I occassionally use Maxwell (though only becase I was sucked into the pre-order deal) but I personally wouldn't buy it now, or recommend it for professional work to others... at least until the rendering speed becomes much more reasonable.

Last edited by Adehus; October 8th, 2007 at 12:30 PM.
Adehus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 8th, 2007   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Maxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Age: 34
Posts: 2,491

Name: Devin Johnston


United_States 


Default Re: Thinking about Maxwell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adehus View Post
If you're thinking towards doing animations (which is what I assume when you say 'video'), I would seriously advise against Maxwell. I've seen some nice animations done with it (yeah you Devin!) but unless you have some SERIOUS computing horsepower, forget it.

I mean, like, FORGET IT!
Very very true.
__________________
“There is no spoon”
http://devinjohnston.cgsociety.org/gallery/
Maxer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 8th, 2007   #8 (permalink)
Moderator
 
AJLynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Beantown
Age: 29
Posts: 4,427

Name: Andrew Lynn


United_States 


Default Re: Thinking about Maxwell

I don't know. You could use a stil frame Ken Burns pan technique and make iPod video
AJLynn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 9th, 2007   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
rotten42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: calgary
Age: 44
Posts: 193

Name: ron volpi


Canada 


Default Re: Thinking about Maxwell

the path seems pretty clear.....I'm going to have to blow the dust of of my wallet and get the Max/Vray package.
__________________
Mental Health is over-rated
rotten42 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old October 9th, 2007   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
AJLynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Beantown
Age: 29
Posts: 4,427

Name: Andrew Lynn


United_States 


Default Re: Thinking about Maxwell

Get a demo of Viz with mental ray and try that. If you're trying to replace Lightscape with a newer render engine, a Max+Vray package may be $2500 in overkill.
AJLynn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Maxwell Render 1.5 Maxer Maxwell Render 205 August 4th, 2007 01:59 PM
Yay, this renderer works like CRAZY Bongo51 Maxwell Render 13 July 20th, 2006 10:30 AM
Maxwell Announcement Maxer Maxwell Render 24 March 16th, 2006 02:03 AM
Maxwell 1.0 Release is pushed back again Maxer Maxwell Render 464 December 20th, 2005 01:25 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:58 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© Copyright 2001 – 2008 CGarchitect Digital Media Corp. All Rights Reserved.