![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Maxwell Render Next Limit Maxwell Renderer |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Long Island, Ny
Posts: 5
Name: Joey Rodrigues |
![]() this was about 14 hours, how the hell do make this run faster and why is it so light and not sharp the exposure is all wrong. PLEASE SOMEONE HELP! I need to put materials in and want the fastest render time. what type of settings should i put. sampling level burn gamma thanks ANYTHING! -JOE- ps. Modeled in sketch-up, and rendered in maxwell |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
eek, 2.3 meg png alert.
as far as i was aware, maxwell doesn't have 'settings' that can speed up render time, its just a matter of leaving it to reach a sampling level which is noise-less enough for you. render times increase with more complex geometry and materials. it's very likely that im wrong there though, as i haven't used it since the beta... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,174
Name: william york |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tampa
Age: 38
Posts: 619
Name: John Dollus |
The image is a bit overexposed so you need to adjust your camera settings to correct that. I would suggest getting Neat Image for decent noise reduction post processing so you don't have to run the process so long. Other than that, like the others said, 14 hrs is about par for the course when it comes to Maxwell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
not sure what 14 h do mean without knowing your tech specs, but anyway, a few tips - maybe you already know them...
make sure you didn't use any reflectance 0 value with a single RGB entry at 255 or just below. personally i stay under 230, but in any case, stay under 240, this results in clearing up noise much faster. the reflectance 90 value has no influence on this. also, try to keep emitters as simple as possible. don't place emitters behind dielectrics if you can avoid it. and, as already suggested, add an invisible emitter plane with the same camera direction, this helps to 'fill' the interior with additional light. be careful not to set this emitter too high, if not you will get the well known 'flash' effect. cheers markus
__________________
3dworks visual computing - berlin, germany www.3dworks.com click here for more images |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| vray interior render drark!! | meme131 | VRay Render | 43 | April 1st, 2008 02:09 PM |
| Quest3d - Real time render | -wolts- | General Discussions | 17 | February 2nd, 2008 01:58 PM |
| Render Time | Esteban Gonzalez | Cinema 4D | 7 | October 8th, 2006 10:24 AM |
| render time | luft | VRay Render | 11 | March 16th, 2006 02:32 PM |
| About to launch into my first night time render... | RyanSpaulding | General Discussions | 7 | December 13th, 2005 09:49 PM |