jayadams

Hey everyone,
I have been tasked with starting up a design dept for a very large engineering firm. It looks as though we will be spearheading the visualization end of the spectrum at this office. I have submitted my 'shopping list' and everything was accepted with one caveat. The 64-bit, they say, will be an issue (due to hardware standards)and I will need to supply some verbage (even heresay explanations from others in the community) backing up the request. I have four (4) quad xeons specced with some quadro fx's. Every large visualization project i've used needs more than the 4gb memory footprint. I know its possible to hunker down the file sizes, but i would love to hear some help from you guys. Photoshop as our mainstay w/ occasional 3d work with the standard V-ray/3dsmax setup. Even really good links would be awesome. Google has given me some, but I thought I'd ask the guys who may have already been in my shoes.

Thanks in advance!

jay

IceAged

Brian Smith

totally agree. and since you said you were with an engineering firm, there's probably a good chance it's a civil eng firm...and if that's the case then the use of very large images (such as high-res satellite images) will be much easier with 64bit.

__________________
Brian Smith
www.3dats.com
3D Architectural Training Solutions

baker1444

64 bit is the way of the future, why go backward? Every year the size and complexity of the scenes will get bigger and require much more memory, its just the way it is.

__________________
"Its so easy to be critical"

AJLynn

Amount of memory. Complexity of scenes (64-bit has much more efficient handling of high complexity geometry) and your hardware can handle it easily - it's what the quad Xeons are designed for.

jayadams

thanks guys. We will be responsible for all of the architectural design and visualization for the retail component of our office. I was hoping to go to them with more than just the 4gb footprint limit.

j.

Dave Buchhofer

just be aware that some legacy tools can have issues with 64bit.. not too many, but check on the compatabilities before you jump.

that said.. really wish i was completely 64bit here. mixed envieronment is a bit annoying to upkeep

__________________
Dave.
TD / EwingCole DMG

BrianKitts

We just finished our final testing and approval for rolling out 64bit upgrades for all 80 or so of the machines in our offices that are compatible. As part of it we did some benchmarking on the test systems setup as 32bit with 4G of RAM and then an identical system running 64bit and 8G of RAM.

The attached PDF has the benchmarking results from Cinebench, as well as render times for two test scenes (images in pdf as well)

The main reason for the upgrades was that one of our projects, a large medical campus, has exceeded 11 million polygons and could no longer be rendered on a 32bit system due to the RAM limitation. But the big benefit I didn't expect was the render time decrease, the attached dusk shot rendered (4000 px wide) in 9 hours on a 32bit system and just over 3 hours on a 64bit system.

One odd thing that I didn't expect is that under a 64bit OS, the OpenGL performance rating with cinebench is actually lower than that on a 32 bit system. We have the most recent drivers for each OS respectively and keep getting the same results both on a Dell 690 and also testing on a Lenovo D10.

Attached Files

Anshen Benchmarks.pdf (313.5 KB, 28 views)

__________________
Brian Kitts
ANSHEN + ALLEN

jayadams

WOW Brian. I can really use that as an example. Thanks so much.

AJLynn

Interesting results.

Maybe there's something weird going on with the nVidia drivers. I can tell you that going from 32 to 64 with a FireGL card gives a slight increase (that might be margin of error) in Cinebench OpenGL.

BTW, my fake Quadros beat your real Quadros My Q6600 with 8800GTS-to-FX4600 is a bit over 6400 in Cinebench and my desk mate's 8600GT-to-FX1700 comes in around 6100.