Accurender not so bad!!!

akzit · April 27th, 2004

I think that Accurender counts as a 3rd party renderer too and for a simple to use program sometimes it can deliver very good images, specially using radiosity and a light dome (UV Eclipse).

I have been using AR3 for the past 7 years. I like to finish the images in Photoshop to add entourage and/or do some photomontage if required.

Tell me what you think of the images. C/C welcome.

Thanks!

akzit · April 28th, 2004

I see that people are looking but no comments or suggestions?

3dp · April 28th, 2004

ahh yes happy memories of accurender 1 betas just beore i jumped ship to 3dsmax
i was using facade/accurender via autocad and getting resonable results although the "look" of accurender became a reason i jumped ship in the end
i notice there is a accurender 4 beta out but i'm stuck in the world of max/maya now so i won't be going back
nice images and a trip down memory lane for me

GaryR50 · May 6th, 2004

That last interior render was pretty sharp, Azkit. What does Accurender cost, by the way?

Gary

mwhite · May 7th, 2004

Here is a rendering that I posted previously on the SU forum. It still needs some tweaking when I get a chance. I have used trueSpace, 3ds and Accurender now and I love Accurender for interiors.

Mike White

STRAT · May 7th, 2004

that final image is lovely, but as with all these images i wouldn't much rate the radiosity/gi

akzit · May 10th, 2004

Gary, thanks for the comments. I think AR3 is around $500 for one license. And I think that AR4 is going to be about the same. Still don't know when it will be released.

John Coleman · June 18th, 2004

I like Accurender because it works within AutoCAD. I can build the model and test it right away.

rbalvaneda · July 24th, 2007

suerte en tu conferencia, me da gusto saber que vamos a tener un mexicano en un evento tan importante.
Saludos

Ricardo
San Diego CA

aaron-cds · July 24th, 2007

Not to be snide, but I've yet to see photo-realism from accurender. Even when it comes close they still look computer generated. If it's easy to use and the clients like it, then go for it.

I don't care for the first four at all, but the last one is great. I love the composition and the reflections. With less people, it would be a very powerfull graphic.

April 28th, 2004	#2 (permalink)
akzit Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Texas Age: 38 Posts: 341 Name: Jorge Tiscareño	Re: Accurender not so bad!!! I see that people are looking but no comments or suggestions?

April 28th, 2004	#3 (permalink)
3dp Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bahrain Age: 44 Posts: 176 Name: david pinnington	Re: Accurender not so bad!!! ahh yes happy memories of accurender 1 betas just beore i jumped ship to 3dsmax i was using facade/accurender via autocad and getting resonable results although the "look" of accurender became a reason i jumped ship in the end i notice there is a accurender 4 beta out but i'm stuck in the world of max/maya now so i won't be going back nice images and a trip down memory lane for me

May 6th, 2004	#4 (permalink)
GaryR50 Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 90 Name: Gary Rea	Re: Accurender not so bad!!! That last interior render was pretty sharp, Azkit. What does Accurender cost, by the way? Gary

May 7th, 2004	#6 (permalink)
STRAT Super Moderator Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK. Age: 36 Posts: 6,488 Name: Stephen Leworthy	Re: Accurender not so bad!!! that final image is lovely, but as with all these images i wouldn't much rate the radiosity/gi

May 10th, 2004	#7 (permalink)
akzit Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Texas Age: 38 Posts: 341 Name: Jorge Tiscareño	Re: Accurender not so bad!!! Gary, thanks for the comments. I think AR3 is around $500 for one license. And I think that AR4 is going to be about the same. Still don't know when it will be released.

June 18th, 2004	#8 (permalink)
John Coleman Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Longmont, CO Posts: 2 Name: John Coleman	Re: Accurender not so bad!!! I like Accurender because it works within AutoCAD. I can build the model and test it right away. __________________ Can't keep your feet on the ground? Get a good firm grip on the clouds!

July 24th, 2007	#9 (permalink)
rbalvaneda Junior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Saan Diego Age: 40 Posts: 1 Name: ricardo Balvaneda	Re: Accurender not so bad!!! suerte en tu conferencia, me da gusto saber que vamos a tener un mexicano en un evento tan importante. Saludos Ricardo San Diego CA

July 24th, 2007	#10 (permalink)
aaron-cds Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Arlington Heights, IL Age: 34 Posts: 703 Name: Aaron Coon	Re: Accurender not so bad!!! Not to be snide, but I've yet to see photo-realism from accurender. Even when it comes close they still look computer generated. If it's easy to use and the clients like it, then go for it. I don't care for the first four at all, but the last one is great. I love the composition and the reflections. With less people, it would be a very powerfull graphic. __________________ Aaron Coon, Conceptual Design Studio Last edited by aaron-cds; July 24th, 2007 at 08:54 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
any accurender users in the forum?	myron	General Discussions	3	June 18th, 2004 11:37 AM
any accurender users???	myron	General Discussions	0	February 16th, 2004 11:39 AM
bad radiosity	jodestroy	Work in Progress (WIP)	14	December 24th, 2003 04:35 AM
Stadium....Used VRAY....but I need help bad...	Dave Bond	Work in Progress (WIP)	6	December 1st, 2003 08:26 AM
Raelly Bad Splellnig is ok	Jeff Mottle	Off Topic	9	September 26th, 2003 08:57 AM