![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| General Discussions For general discussions about rendering, animations, walkthroughs and CGarchitecture |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
President/Founder
|
Hey Everyone,
Well it only took 7 hours, but the transition to Server 2003 is complete. You will notice a few things over the next 48 hours as the new IP propogates throughout the internet: 1. Banners will not serve until the DNS that your ISP uses is updated. 2. Images and avatars that were uploaded using our upload utility will also not show up until your ISP's DSN updates 3. The site address will show up as an IP until your ISP's DNS updates. 4. The site will be a bit slower until your ISP's DNS updates becuase we are redirecting all the traffic via the old server. There is overhead associated with this so it takes a bit longer. Once you see www.cgarchitect.com as the URL when you access our site you will be switched over IF YOU FIND ANYTHING DOES NOT WORK PROPERLY PLEASE EMAIL ME ASAP AT: jmottle@cgarchitect.com If you absolutley can't stand to wait edit your HOSTS file. If you don't know how. DO NOT EDIT IT! If you do, please do not forget to change it back in 48 hours. Thanks Everyone. Ok time to go to bed.
__________________
Jeff Mottle CGarchitect.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
President/Founder
|
I had not planned on it, but if people are interested I could. Do you find the site to be faster now that it was before? I know I do, but I just wanted to know if it was me. Kinda like driving your car right after a car wash.
One thing that could have made a difference is that I am now hosting the MSSQL dataabse on my server. That and 2003 is known to be faster and better at memory managment. I've added more and use the same RAM, so it's gotta be true.
__________________
Jeff Mottle CGarchitect.com |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Invalid User Profile
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 825
Name: gareth ace |
Yeah, it is faster. I used to be having real problems on 56k at home. I just hate the way the broadband thing is going in this country. They privatised the phone company, and floated it on the stock market. Now some big guy owns it and 90% of the newspapers in Ireland too!
Building a Better Web Server I talked to guys over at aces, and they reckon, the size of CG Architect web pages could be at least halved. They are somewhere around 300kbs now, and should normally be in the region of 150kb (with Avitars etc) for vBulletin forums. Apparently the combined Avitars here are like 100KB to download on the page. Here is the anandtech story It think it would be great to see what drives all of this stuff actually. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
President/Founder
|
Gareth,
Some of what they talk about will be helped when I move to vBulliten, which we are not using now, and when I re-design the back end on the ASP.NET framework. Right now the pages are the size they are because of images. They are all optimimised as much as they can be without loosing qulity, so there is not much you can do there short of HTML compression, which typically only works well on static pages. I'm not sure where you are getting 300K becuase the home page which is the most graphic intensive is only 83K and the biggest page I have found is 214K I'm affraid the CGA story would not be near as exciting as Anatech...I only run a single server and single processor. It's a P4 2.4 Ghz/80 GB RAID 1 IDE/2GB RAM Not sure how much more you would want to know. My host has Cisco 7200 Series Router with BGP4 Multi-homed and 4 Upstream providers to the site. [ September 22, 2003, 07:45 AM: Message edited by: Jeff Mottle ]
__________________
Jeff Mottle CGarchitect.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Invalid User Profile
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 825
Name: gareth ace |
I realise the fundamental conflict between web site ways to display, or navigate through visual information, and that of an Architectural presentation board. I guess we are just working around the limitations of current technology, in order to make some kind of discussion and interaction possible at all.
http://www.cgarchitect.com/ubb/ultim...623;p=1#000005 Let I speak about here. The Web site department should be a different skill from the A1 board presentation department of an Architectural firm in my view. And guys like Daniel, are now in danger of polluting their own natural presentation skills as Architects used to large format spongeboard mounted stuff, with the ideas of 15-inch screens on laptops and PDAs, super-duper picture mobile phones etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Invalid User Profile
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 825
Name: gareth ace |
Yeah, that is good information alright. I would like to have it on a web page somewhere though, where I could link for my technical minded buddies. I am sure they might explain to me, in a way I could understand, what some of that tech-speak actually means.
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|