Welcome to CGarchitect.com Untitled Document

Go Back   CGarchitect.com > MAIN FORUMS > General Discussions

Notices

General Discussions For general discussions about rendering, animations, walkthroughs and CGarchitecture

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 8th, 2004   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: tel aviv
Posts: 17

Name: yaniv ophir


Israel 


Default cg confusion

hi, i'm an arch. student, working on 3Dsmax 6. i'm looking for a modelling program with greater accuracy, kinda like a mix between autocadd and 3Dsmax. i've heard that rhino 3.v could be the answer...i would gladly accept any advice on the subject. thank u!
keyboard cowboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 8th, 2004   #2 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Ernest Burden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ossining, NY USA
Posts: 4,999

Name: Ernest Burden III


United_States 


Default Re: cg confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by keyboard cowboy
hi, i'm an arch. student, working on 3Dsmax 6. i'm looking for a modelling program with greater accuracy, kinda like a mix between autocadd and 3Dsmax. i've heard that rhino 3.v could be the answer...i would gladly accept any advice on the subject. thank u!
Rhino is great, very CAD-like, great company.

FormZ is also a great, accurate, modeler, great company. I just find it weird in how it works, not at all intuitive.

Rhino is less expensive, FZ has more preset modeling tasks. In truth, you cannot go wrong either way.

If you are used to the workflow of MAX, you can also look at Cinema4D, which costs more than FormZ but much less than MAX, and is a modeler AND a great renderer.

Lightwave users seem like a happy lot, though I've never used it myself.
__________________
Ernest Burden III
AcmeDigital
architectural rendering
Ernest Burden is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 8th, 2004   #3 (permalink)
mbr
Veteran Member
 
mbr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles and Connecticut....and Denver
Posts: 1,266

Name: Markus Byron


 


Default Re: cg confusion

I am an architect, too. FormZ is my favorite, even though I am using Max all the time now. Nothing is faster to model architecture than FormZ (from my experience).

It's OpenGL performance is lightyears above Max's, making the modeling go much faster.
mbr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 8th, 2004   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Brian Cassil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Ut.
Age: 36
Posts: 2,017

Name: Brian Cassil


United_States 




Default Re: cg confusion

The local architecture school here uses Form-Z because of it's CAD like controls.
Brian Cassil is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 8th, 2004   #5 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Tim Nelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Providence, RI
Age: 30
Posts: 1,612

Name: Tim Nelson


United_States  Send a message via Skype™ to Tim Nelson


Default Re: cg confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Cassil
The local architecture school here uses Form-Z because of it's CAD like controls.
I think all the schools use it because auto-des-sys gives it to them for free in hopes that graduates will continue to use Form-Z when they start their professional careers. People use what they are most comfortable with, so get them hooked early, right?
Tim Nelson is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 8th, 2004   #6 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Ernest Burden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ossining, NY USA
Posts: 4,999

Name: Ernest Burden III


United_States 


Default Re: cg confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Cassil
The local architecture school here uses Form-Z because of it's CAD like controls.
I would not call FormZ's controls CAD-like. Far from it.

But Rhino's I would. In fact, I already did.

FormZ is a great program, but to use it effectively you really have to drink the KoolAde.
__________________
Ernest Burden III
AcmeDigital
architectural rendering
Ernest Burden is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 8th, 2004   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
crazy homeless guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,917

Name: travis schmiesing


United_States 


Default Re: cg confusion

maybe it is because i learned on formz first, but i find it very quick and intuitive to work with. although i have, and just did, hear others state otherwise.

i am still trying to get myself to model sloppy after years of perfect accuracy. it is actually hard to do.
__________________
travis schmiesing
crazy homeless guy is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 8th, 2004   #8 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Ernest Burden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ossining, NY USA
Posts: 4,999

Name: Ernest Burden III


United_States 


Default Re: cg confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy homeless guy
i am still trying to get myself to model sloppy after years of perfect accuracy. it is actually hard to do.
I know, same here.

But the original question is about modeling with more accuracy, so that is why I suggested FZ and Rhino.

Both, by the way, use actual, real-world units.
__________________
Ernest Burden III
AcmeDigital
architectural rendering
Ernest Burden is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old September 9th, 2004   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Jim Mann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 324

Name: Jim Mann


United Kingdom 


Default Re: cg confusion

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy homeless guy
i am still trying to get myself to model sloppy after years of perfect accuracy. it is actually hard to do.
I was taught to use AutoCAD by a Filipina I worked with in Hong Kong back in 1992. Her words of wisdom still ring true with regards to accuracy...

"With CAD (and now 3D I guess - JM) its harder to get things wrong than it is to get them right" - Jocelyn Sanchez

To this day I still can't say "plot" without it coming out in a Filipino accent.

In terms of accuracy, I cant comment on the others but Rhino is very accurate and feels a bit like an AutoCAD clone in terms of interface/operation. That said, what problems are you having with Max and accuracy? I model to the millimeter and still seem to model more accurately than the CAD drawings that I get from the average architect. Do you really need super accurate? Once you get onto a building site, you will find accurate to be a rather flexible term.

Jim
Jim Mann is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old September 9th, 2004   #10 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dublin
Age: 39
Posts: 550

Name: philip kelly


Ireland 


Default Re: cg confusion

Form z is good..........

But as far as a company I don't think they are up to much.
The upgrades for the last two, were average.
They have holes all over the package.
I's accurate, but at the end of the day you have to go else were to render, it's rendering is not that good, And I have used it for 6 years now, so i have enough experience to know, you really have to ush the thing to get what you want out of it.
Interior rendering is out really, as far as renderzone is concerened.

I also had the problem of switchng from v3.5 on a mac to pc a straight dongle swap.

They would not do a straight swap.
I had to upgrade, which cost all in 1000 euros for an upgrade, a complete ripoff, and they can not defend that.
They have not ated their libraries for 4 years, there are next to no plug-ins if any , they are all promised and the ones that are out are ok, you can do as good in photoshop.

saying that the modeling is good........and that's all it is.
phil
philip kelly is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hyper-threading and 3ds max system, conundrum, confusion, Please Help ! serious Hardware and Technical Discusions 8 February 11th, 2003 02:34 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:07 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
© Copyright 2001 – 2008 CGarchitect Digital Media Corp. All Rights Reserved.